Should Recycling Be Required by Law?

PRO MANDATORY RECYCLING * Recycling is so beneficial for our planet that it should definitely be required. In an ideal world, every cardinal would voluntarily recycle, only if lets face it Thats never going to happen. It makes me so angry when I watch students in my school throw their plastic water bottles in the trash buns when there is a cycle can rectify next to it * Nearly 70 zillion tons of material ar kept away from landfills each year thanks to recycling, according to the study Recycling Coalition. If we have just 30 percent of the population recycling, wed shrivel up greenhouse gas emissions as more as if we removed 25 million cars from the road Imagine how many greenhouse gas emissions we could cut rid of if everyone recycled. * Its so easy to recycle, and if more mess do it, accordingly it be espouses more cost-effective. Some the great unwashed against requisite recycling say that its costly, but recycling is a less expensive process if more people are involve d.In fact, two years after spick-and-span York City dogged that mandatory recycling was a drain on the city be $40 million they discovered that a redesigned, more efficient recycling system could actually save the city $20 million late York City has now signed a 20-year recycling contract. * We need to energize more cities and states on progress with mandatory recycling. In addition to help the environment, recycling programs help stimulate the economy by creating more jobs. The benefits of mandatory recycling far outweigh the drawbacks, and its up to you, CosmoGIRL eaders, to get your cities on board Write to your local official and let her or him know how you touch sensation about mandatory recycling. Your actions can make all the difference Laura Carusco, 18, New York City, NY ANTI MANDATORY RECYCLING * Mandatory recycling is one of the newest fads in the go green movement. But what you may not realize is that its besides one of the most costly and wasteful activities to infiltrate America. * Contrary to what most people think, recycling does not save irreplaceable sources. Take a grammatical construction at the current termss for everyday items, like paper.According to the c erstpt of write out and demand, since the price is so cheap, there must be a large supply that backs it up. For example, a pack of notebook paper ranges from just 20 cents to 50 cents. If we were at risk of running out of trees, the price would be much higher. * Also, by utilize less of one resource, we are inevitably using more of others. Daniel K. Benjamin, senior associate of the Property and Environment Research Center, express in a report that on average, curbside recycling is 35 to 55 percent more costly nationwide than conventional disposal. Benjamin goes on to say that in Seattle, where the council decided to make recycling mandatory, they are cachexia resources by charging too much for trash pickup and not charging decent for recycling pickup. Also, think abo ut all of the extra pollution caused by the recycling pickup trucks Its like having a garbage truck come through twice a week instead of just once. * Its also a misconception that were running out of room in our landfills. There is replete room just in America to last us for years, and we can always add landfills.Another misconception is that our trash is harmful, but according to the Environmental surety Agency, a cancer-related expiration due to modern landfills only occurs about once every 50 years. Cancer causes over half a million deaths a year in the United States alone, so one cancer-related death every 50 years doesnt even compare. * Although voluntary recycling has its benefits, it is all told unnecessary and wasteful to make it mandatory. Aliza Sajjad, 18, Concord, CA