GFP Bunny Essay

Oswald Chambers at one time said that, We are in danger of forgetting that we can non do what God does, and that God exit non do what we can do (http//home. att. net/quotesabout/god. html). In a auberge which is unendingly making progress, pitying macrocosms do not understand the repercussions of new scientific discoveries and often cross the delicate line of being human and contend God. Science gives us security as it is considered to be the cure to entirely evil.What eludes us is that in the act of eradicating this evil, we inadvertently bring into being a newer, more powerful evil. master Frankenstein, the focal character in Mary Shellys novel Frankenstein and Aylmer, the antagonistic character in Nathaniel Hawthornes short story The Birthmark both become so habituated in their hobbyhorses of creation, that they forget their human limitations ending up with chaos and destruction.In the story, The Birthmark, Aylmer tells his newly wed wife that he is shocked by the bir thmark on her face, as it is the visible mark of e rusehly smirch (Hawthorne 1131). His aspects and words hurt his wife greatly, which drives her to a point where she would rather sound than live on another day with the hideous birthmark on her face. As Georgiana imparts on to her hubby, her wish to get the birthmark removed once and for all, Aylmer is fueled to succeed at all costs.He rents out an panoptic apartment where he observes Georgina and delves in a variety of natural philosophies so that he can remove her birthmark once and for all. Aylmer is so cloaked in playing God to remove a human stigma so his wife can get rid of her mortal spirit that he does not realize that he lacks the powers to make things around him flawless. It is this obsession, which finally eradicates the birthmark. But along with the birthmark, a fair Georgiana becomes a martyr for her husbands cause.Similarly Victor Frankenstein, the character created by Mary Shelly, wishes to procure in the se crets of heaven and earth (Shelley 45) however, despite having the intentions to banish disease from the human frame (Shelley 47), he is completely careless in accepting responsibilities for his creation. later his mothers devastation, Frankenstein becomes a victim of fate. It is fate coupled with his lasting thirst for knowledge that leads to the monsters creation. An ambitious Frankenstein eventually goes against Mother Nature by creating the monster.Frankenstein and Aylmers actions of creating heart and beauty respectively parallel the nature of youthful cloning efforts by the Clonaid Corporation. According to The Economist On December twenty-seventh Clonaid, a firm associated with the Raelians, a religious sect, announced that it had succeeded in producing the areas first human clonean allegedly healthy botch girl called Eve, born to an unnamed American woman at an unrevealed location (61-62). Cloning has been going on for years and numerous animals seduce been cloned.Cr itics, skeptics and supporters have paid minimal attention to this sensitive subject because it has never affected our lives in a direct way. But as our take species are being cloned, we cant help only if to wiretap and think about the implications of cloning. In recognitions great pursuit to take over gods duties, one wonders whether creating clones is ethical and moral, not only to the clone that may suffer serious deformities but to the society it will be unleashed upon. Science is trying to create a life which they cannot govern later on as natures will eventually take over. Paranoid.Human Beings have always been inclined towards art and beauty. It is in our nature to lay emphasis on beauty and creation. It is something that mesmerizes us and wheels us into great depths. Art that is created naturally can be bewitching at times, but when our obsession with superficiality drives us to inject science into this artistic force, we are looking at a grotesque and unethical piece o f creation. Aylmer was so fixated on his wifes beauty that he saw the birthmark as a sign of her mortal nature. He saw the birthmark as a symbol of imperfection, sorrow, decay and death all things ugly.He is eager to remove the birthmark and tells Georgiana, his humble wife that he is convinced of the perfect practicability of its removal (Hawthorne 1132). Aylmer with his earlier experiences at taming nature sees no reason why he should not further beautify his nearly perfect wife upon whom nature has fixed its ugly stamp. Frankensteins creation The monster has also been judged at a superficial level from the very beginning. Following the birth of his creation, he flat gives the monster a feeling of being on the outside of society.Victor responds to his creation by saying, I beheld the wretchthe miserable monster whom I had created (Shelley 61). It is his initial rejection which leads the monster to plead with Frankenstein You, my creator, abhor me what hope can I gather from you r fellow-creatures, who owe me nothing? they spurn and hate me (Shelley 94). The creature struggles with the thought of being unwanted because of his grotesque looks. The monster was a benevolent creature, but as he was shunned by people for his external appearance, he turn miserable and vengeful.

Should Recycling Be Required by Law?

PRO MANDATORY RECYCLING * Recycling is so beneficial for our planet that it should definitely be required. In an ideal world, every cardinal would voluntarily recycle, only if lets face it Thats never going to happen. It makes me so angry when I watch students in my school throw their plastic water bottles in the trash buns when there is a cycle can rectify next to it * Nearly 70 zillion tons of material ar kept away from landfills each year thanks to recycling, according to the study Recycling Coalition. If we have just 30 percent of the population recycling, wed shrivel up greenhouse gas emissions as more as if we removed 25 million cars from the road Imagine how many greenhouse gas emissions we could cut rid of if everyone recycled. * Its so easy to recycle, and if more mess do it, accordingly it be espouses more cost-effective. Some the great unwashed against requisite recycling say that its costly, but recycling is a less expensive process if more people are involve d.In fact, two years after spick-and-span York City dogged that mandatory recycling was a drain on the city be $40 million they discovered that a redesigned, more efficient recycling system could actually save the city $20 million late York City has now signed a 20-year recycling contract. * We need to energize more cities and states on progress with mandatory recycling. In addition to help the environment, recycling programs help stimulate the economy by creating more jobs. The benefits of mandatory recycling far outweigh the drawbacks, and its up to you, CosmoGIRL eaders, to get your cities on board Write to your local official and let her or him know how you touch sensation about mandatory recycling. Your actions can make all the difference Laura Carusco, 18, New York City, NY ANTI MANDATORY RECYCLING * Mandatory recycling is one of the newest fads in the go green movement. But what you may not realize is that its besides one of the most costly and wasteful activities to infiltrate America. * Contrary to what most people think, recycling does not save irreplaceable sources. Take a grammatical construction at the current termss for everyday items, like paper.According to the c erstpt of write out and demand, since the price is so cheap, there must be a large supply that backs it up. For example, a pack of notebook paper ranges from just 20 cents to 50 cents. If we were at risk of running out of trees, the price would be much higher. * Also, by utilize less of one resource, we are inevitably using more of others. Daniel K. Benjamin, senior associate of the Property and Environment Research Center, express in a report that on average, curbside recycling is 35 to 55 percent more costly nationwide than conventional disposal. Benjamin goes on to say that in Seattle, where the council decided to make recycling mandatory, they are cachexia resources by charging too much for trash pickup and not charging decent for recycling pickup. Also, think abo ut all of the extra pollution caused by the recycling pickup trucks Its like having a garbage truck come through twice a week instead of just once. * Its also a misconception that were running out of room in our landfills. There is replete room just in America to last us for years, and we can always add landfills.Another misconception is that our trash is harmful, but according to the Environmental surety Agency, a cancer-related expiration due to modern landfills only occurs about once every 50 years. Cancer causes over half a million deaths a year in the United States alone, so one cancer-related death every 50 years doesnt even compare. * Although voluntary recycling has its benefits, it is all told unnecessary and wasteful to make it mandatory. Aliza Sajjad, 18, Concord, CA